BSI PAS 24:2022
$215.11
Enhanced security performance requirements for doorsets and windows in the UK. Doorsets and windows intended to offer a level of security suitable for dwellings and other buildings exposed to comparable risk
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 94 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
5 | Foreword |
7 | 1 Scope |
8 | 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
11 | 4 Enhanced security requirements 4.1 General |
12 | 4.2 Infill medium requirements 4.3 Letter plates 4.4 Classification 5 Marking |
13 | 6 Design and general requirements 6.1 Doorsets 6.2 Installation instructions |
14 | Annex A (normative) Security hardware and cylinder test and assessment |
19 | Table A.1 — List of tools permitted for use in the assessment of the cylinder |
20 | Figure A.1 — Typical straight jaw self-gripping pliers Figure A.2 — Typical straight jaw detail Figure A.3 — Typical curved jaw self-gripping pliers |
21 | Figure A.4 — Typical curved jaw detail Figure A.5 — Typical shallow curve head |
22 | Figure A.6 — Typical shallow curve head detail |
23 | Figure A.7 — Typical hook attachment |
24 | Figure A.8 — Typical hook attachment detail Annex B (normative) Enhanced security performance requirements for doorsets |
26 | Figure B.1 — Flow chart for doorsets |
31 | Figure B.2 — Cutting test zones |
38 | Figure B.3 — Parallel-to-plane loading along the edge |
39 | Figure B.4 — Parallel-to-plane loading at right angles to the edge |
40 | Figure B.5 — Parallel-to-plane loading at a mullion or transom |
41 | Figure B.6 — Perpendicular-to-plane loading |
42 | Figure B.7 — Example of a suitable test bracket |
43 | Figure B.8 — Outer frame support |
44 | Figure B.9 — Loading pad for mechanical loading |
45 | Figure B.10 — Example of loading bridge |
46 | Figure B.11 — Soft body impact test apparatus |
47 | Figure B.12 — Hard body impact test apparatus |
48 | Figure B.13 — Mechanical loading sequence: single and multiple leaf Figure B.14 — Soft and heavy body impact points: single and multiple leaf |
49 | Figure B.15 — Hard body impact points and sequence: single and multiple leaf |
50 | Figure B.16 — Example of propping case for folding sliding doors |
51 | Table B.1 — Standard loading cases for single leaf doorsets without integral side panels or fanlights |
52 | Table B.2 — Standard loading cases for single leaf doorsets with integral side panels or fanlights |
55 | Table B.3 — Standard loading cases for all double doors, active and inactive leaf without integral side panels or fanlights |
57 | Table B.4 — Standard loading cases for all double doors, active and inactive leaf with integral side panels or fanlights |
60 | Table B.5 — Standard loading cases for folding sliding doors, active and inactive leaf without integral side panels or fanlights |
62 | Table B.6 — Standard loading cases for horizontal sliding doors, active and inactive leaves without integral side panels or fanlights |
64 | Annex C (normative) Specification for enhanced security performance of windows |
65 | Figure C.1 — Flow chart of test procedures |
72 | Figure C.2 — Typical test arrangement |
73 | Figure C.3 — Test sample mounting |
74 | Figure C.4 — Parallel-to-plane loading along the edge |
75 | Figure C.5 — Parallel-to-plane loading at right angles to the edge |
76 | Figure C.6 — Parallel-to-plane loading at a mullion or transom |
77 | Figure C.7 — Perpendicular-to-plane loading |
79 | Figure C.8 — Typical test bracket |
80 | Figure C.9 — Typical outer frame support |
81 | Figure C.10 — Typical mullion and transom support |
82 | Figure C.11 — Typical loading pad |
83 | Figure C.12 — Typical loading bridge |
84 | Figure C.13 — Typical installation of test window into timber sub-frame Figure C.14 — Typical loading sequences |
87 | Figure C.15 — Local configuration for a typical vertical sliding window |
89 | Table C.1 — Standard loading cases |
92 | Bibliography |