BS EN IEC 62923-1:2018
$215.11
Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems. Bridge alert management – Operational and performance requirements, methods of testing and required test results
| Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
| BSI | 2018 | 124 |
IEC 62923-1:2018 specifies the operational and performance requirements, methods of testing, and required test results for the bridge alert management (BAM) in support of IMO resolution MSC.302(87). It is applicable to all alerts presented on and transferred to the bridge
PDF Catalog
| PDF Pages | PDF Title |
|---|---|
| 2 | undefined |
| 5 | Annex ZA(normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
| 7 | English CONTENTS |
| 12 | FOREWORD |
| 14 | INTRODUCTION |
| 15 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
| 16 | 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms and definitions |
| 21 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms |
| 22 | 4 Description 4.1 Purpose 4.2 EUT function types |
| 23 | 4.3 Application 4.4 Implementation of BAM interfaces |
| 24 | 4.5 Clusters Figures Figure 1 – Interfacing legacy alert sources with BAM compliant equipment |
| 25 | 5 Test methods 5.1 Subject of tests 5.2 Test set-ups 5.3 General requirements Figure 2 – Example of cluster-dependent alert management limitations |
| 26 | 5.4 Configuration for testing 6 Module A – Presentation and handling of alerts on the bridge 6.1 General 6.1.1 Provisions 6.1.2 Number of alerts for one situation |
| 27 | 6.1.3 Alert presentation at several locations 6.1.4 Central alert management HMI |
| 28 | 6.2 Priorities classification and categories 6.2.1 Applicability 6.2.2 Requirement |
| 30 | 6.2.3 Methods of test and required results 6.3 Presentation and state of alerts 6.3.1 Applicability 6.3.2 General |
| 31 | Tables Table 1 – Alert states and related conditions Table 2 – Alert state and presentation for emergency alarms |
| 32 | Table 3 – Alert state and presentation for alarms |
| 33 | Table 4 – Alert state and presentation for warnings Table 5 – Alert state and presentation for cautions |
| 34 | 6.3.3 Emergency alarms 6.3.4 Alarms |
| 39 | 6.3.5 Warnings |
| 44 | 6.3.6 Cautions 6.3.7 Alert escalation |
| 46 | 6.4 Presentation of alerts on the bridge 6.4.1 Applicability 6.4.2 General requirements |
| 50 | 6.4.3 Aids for decision making 6.4.4 Audible annunciation |
| 51 | Figure 3 – Multiple alerts with audible annunciation existing simultaneously Figure 4 – Occurrence of alerts during a temporary silence period |
| 52 | Figure 5 – Escalation of a warning as warning during a temporary silence period Figure 6 – Occurrence of multiple warnings |
| 53 | 6.4.5 Display of icons 6.4.6 Functionality to help reduce the number of high-priority alerts |
| 54 | 6.5 Systems failures, redundancies, back-up and fallback arrangements 6.5.1 Applicability 6.5.2 Requirement |
| 55 | 6.5.3 Methods of test and required results |
| 56 | 6.6 Documentation 6.6.1 Applicability |
| 57 | 6.6.2 Requirement 6.6.3 Methods of test and required results 6.7 Functional alert grouping 6.7.1 Applicability 6.7.2 Functional alert group source |
| 60 | 6.7.3 Functional alert group display |
| 62 | 6.8 Alert aggregation 6.8.1 Applicability 6.8.2 Alert aggregation source |
| 64 | 6.8.3 Aggregation display |
| 66 | 6.9 Responsibility transfer 6.9.1 EUT performing revaluation |
| 67 | 6.9.2 EUT as source of alerts |
| 68 | 7 Module B – Central alert management system functionality 7.1 Applicability 7.2 Central alert management human machine interface (CAM-HMI) 7.2.1 General requirements |
| 72 | 7.2.2 Aggregated header alerts |
| 73 | 7.2.3 Alert history |
| 75 | 7.3 Functional aspects of a CAM 7.3.1 Requirement 7.3.2 Methods of test and required results |
| 76 | 7.4 Back-up and redundancies 7.4.1 Requirement 7.4.2 Methods of test and required results 7.5 System failures and fallback arrangements 7.5.1 Requirement |
| 77 | 7.5.2 Methods of test and required results |
| 78 | 8 Module C – Interfacing 8.1 Interfacing requirements for alert-related communication 8.1.1 Communication protocol |
| 79 | 8.1.2 Alert priority, state and text |
| 80 | 8.1.3 Time of last change 8.1.4 Acknowledgement and silence |
| 81 | 8.1.5 Aggregation |
| 82 | 8.1.6 Reconnection 8.2 Connection to the ship’s power supply 8.2.1 Applicability 8.2.2 Requirement 8.2.3 Methods of test and required results 8.3 Function not in operational use 8.3.1 Applicability |
| 83 | 8.3.2 Requirement 8.3.3 Methods of test and required results 9 Module D – System and equipment documentation for CAM system 9.1 Applicability 9.2 Manuals 9.2.1 Requirement 9.2.2 Methods of test and required results 9.3 Information regarding system configuration for surveyor 9.3.1 Requirement |
| 84 | 9.3.2 Methods of tests and required results 9.4 Failure analysis 9.4.1 Requirement 9.4.2 Methods of test and required results 9.5 Guidance to equipment manufacturers for the provision of on-board familiarization material 9.5.1 Requirement 9.5.2 Methods of test and required results |
| 85 | Annex A (informative)Test set-ups A.1 Applicability A.2 Purpose A.3 Generic representation |
| 86 | Figure A.1 – BAM concept |
| 87 | A.4 Test set-up 1 A.5 Test set-up 2 Figure A.2 – Test set-up 1: no revaluation of input data |
| 88 | A.6 Test set-up 3 Figure A.3 – Test set-up 2: with revaluation of input data |
| 89 | A.7 Test set-up 4 Figure A.4 – Test set-up 3: BAM compliant CAM system |
| 90 | Figure A.5 – Test set-up 4: BAM/CAM system compliant INS |
| 91 | Annex B (informative)Guidance to equipment manufacturers for the provision of on-board familiarization material(Appendix 2 of IMO Resolution MSC.302(87)) B.1 Applicability B.2 General B.3 On-board familiarization |
| 92 | B.4 Familiarization training framework B.4.1 General description B.4.2 Detailed operation |
| 93 | Annex C (normative)Logical interfaces for alert communication C.1 Applicability C.2 Logical interfaces Figure C.1 – Logical interfaces |
| 94 | C.3 Alert sentences for exchanging alert information |
| 95 | Table C.1 – IEC 61162-1 sentences received by BAM compliant equipment |
| 96 | C.4 Alert communication in case of successful revaluation and priority reduction Table C.2 – IEC 61162-1 sentences transmitted by BAM compliant equipment |
| 97 | C.5 Alert communication in case of unsuccessful revaluation Figure C.2 – Alert communication showing priority reduction, alert condition rectified |
| 98 | C.6 Additional requirements for use of BAM sentences on IEC 61162-450 C.6.1 Use of ALF C.6.2 Use of ALC Figure C.3 – Alert communication in case of no priority reduction, with user acknowledgement |
| 99 | C.6.3 Use of ACN C.6.4 Use of ARC C.6.5 Use of AGL C.7 Alert communication in case of inconsistent content of ALF messages |
| 100 | Annex D (informative)Properties of aggregation and functional grouping Table D.1 – Properties of aggregation and functional grouping |
| 101 | Annex E (informative)Guidance on alert management E.1 Applicability E.2 Alert management strategic changes E.3 Alert management tactics |
| 102 | E.4 Alert management means and methods E.4.1 Overview Figure E.1 – Alert management decision flow |
| 103 | E.4.2 Functional alerts |
| 105 | E.4.3 Tools |
| 107 | E.4.4 Clusters |
| 108 | Figure E.2 – Clusters and their functional relations |
| 109 | E.4.5 Technical and structural approach |
| 110 | Annex F (normative)Icons for alert management Table F.1 – Alert management icons – basic |
| 112 | Table F.2 – Alert management icons – additional qualifiers Table F.3 – Alert management icons – selected display status |
| 113 | Annex G (normative)Alert state diagrams Figure G.1 – State diagram of an alert of priority emergency alarm |
| 114 | Figure G.2 – State diagram of an alert of priority alarm |
| 115 | Figure G.3 – State diagram of an alert of priority warning Figure G.4 – State diagram of an alert of priority caution |
| 116 | Annex H (normative)Legacy alert handling H.1 Applicability H.2 Introduction to legacy alert sources Figure H.1 – Division of functional blocks of alert management when BAM compliant alert source is interfaced to CAM Figure H.2 – Division of functional blocks of alert management when legacy alert source is interfaced to CAM |
| 117 | H.3 Conversion of legacy alerts H.3.1 Requirement H.3.2 Methods of test and required results |
| 119 | Annex I (normative)Alert group list (AGL) message for functional grouping I.1 Applicability I.2 General I.3 AGL – Alert group list |
| 120 | Annex J (normative)TAG block for cluster identification J.1 Applicability J.2 General J.3 Destination cluster identification “x” J.4 Source cluster identification “z” |
| 121 | Annex K (informative)Additional talker identifiers for alert sources Table K.1 – Talker identifiers for automation equipment |
| 122 | Bibliography |
