BSI PD IEC/TR 62669:2011
$215.11
Case studies supporting IEC 62232. Determination of RF field strength and SAR in the vicinity of radiocommunication base stations for the purpose of evaluating human exposure
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2011 | 218 |
This technical report presents a series of case studies in which electromagnetic (EM) fields are evaluated in accordance with IEC 62232. It also provides a reporting template cross referenced to IEC 62232.
Each case study has been chosen to illustrate a typical radio base station (RBS) evaluation scenario and employs the methods detailed in IEC 62232. Some of the case studies demonstrate more than one evaluation method. However, in most situations only one method would be required to complete an evaluation.
The case studies documented in this report are provided for guidance only and are not a substitute for a thorough understanding of the requirements of IEC 62232.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | CONTENTS |
5 | FOREWORD |
7 | INTRODUCTION |
8 | 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions, symbols and abbreviated terms 4 Overview of case studies 4.1 Case study synopsis |
9 | 4.2 Micro cell case study Figures Figure 1 – Micro cell case study |
10 | 4.3 Roof-top case study with nearby apartment buildings Figure 2 – Roof-top case study with nearby apartment buildings |
11 | 4.4 Roof-top / tower case study in residential area Figure 3 – Roof-top / tower case study in residential area |
12 | 4.5 Roof-top case study with direct access to antennas Figure 4 – Roof-top case study with direct access to antennas |
13 | 4.6 Roof-top case study with large antennas and no direct access 4.7 Circular cylindrical compliance boundary determination case study with large antennas and no direct access Figure 5 – Roof-top case study with large antennas and no direct access |
14 | 4.8 Tower case study in parkland Figure 6 – Cylindrical compliance boundary determinationfor dual band antenna on building |
15 | 4.9 Multiple towers case study at sports venue Figure 7 – Tower case study in parkland |
16 | 4.10 In-building base station case study Figure 8 – Multiple towers case study at sports venue |
17 | Figure 9 – Office building IBC case study |
18 | Annex A (informative) Micro cell case study |
28 | Tables Table 4.1 — Compliance distances for general public (GP) and occupational (O) exposure for the specified configurations. Table 4.2 — Compliance distances for general public (GP) and occupational (O) exposure for the specified configurations |
29 | Table 4.3 — Expanded uncertainty for the methods used. |
43 | Annex B (informative) Roof-top case study with nearby apartments |
48 | Table 2: Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 reference limits for Controlled and Uncontrolled Environments. |
49 | Table 3: Physical parameters for the antenna systems from service provider A Table 4: Physical parameters for the antenna systems from service provider B |
68 | Figure 11: Narda SRM-3000 measurement scan for the frequency range of 54 MHz-765 MHz Figure 12: Narda SRM-3000 measurement scan for the 800 MHz frequency range |
69 | Figure 13: Narda SRM-3000 measurement scan for the 1900 MHz frequency range |
70 | Annex C (informative) Roof-top / tower case study in residential area |
100 | Annex D (informative) Roof-top case study with direct access to antennas |
128 | Annex E (informative) Roof-top case study with no direct access to antennas |
145 | Annex F (informative) Circular cylindrical compliance boundary determination case study |
148 | Table 1: Operator technology information |
149 | Table 2: ICNIRP basic restrictions valid in the frequency range 10 MHz – 10 GHz. |
150 | Table 3: Physical parameters. |
154 | Table 4: Dimensions of the cylindrical compliance boundaries for the specified configuration (GP=General Public RF exposure, Occ=Occupational RF exposure). |
157 | Annex G (informative) Tower case study in parkland |
172 | Annex H (informative) Tower case study at sports venue |
193 | Annex I (informative) In-building base station case study |
214 | Annex J (informative) Evaluation template and sample uncertainty table |