{"id":420726,"date":"2024-10-20T06:32:35","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T06:32:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-62679-5-12017-2\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T12:14:32","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T12:14:32","slug":"bsi-pd-iec-tr-62679-5-12017-2","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-62679-5-12017-2\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD IEC\/TR 62679-5-1:2017"},"content":{"rendered":"
This part of IEC 62679 , which is a technical report, specifies the legibility in terms of contrast, spatial frequency, and reflection of the screen as a function of the physical parameters of an EPD. This legibility evaluation model is introduced through both subjective and objective assessments. The scope of this document is restricted to EPDs using segment, passive, and active matrixes with monochromatic type displays.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 References 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 3.2 Abbreviated terms 4 Contrast sensitivity test chart (CSC) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | Figure 1 \u2013 Layout of patches Figure 2 \u2013 Example of patch of CSC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | 5 Objective assessment 5.1 General Figure 3 \u2013 Spatial frequency per unit viewing angle Table 1 \u2013 Properties of five kinds of paper <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 5.2 Conditions of objective assessment 5.3 Photometric characteristics for CSC Figure 4 \u2013 Measuring apparatus geometry <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | Figure 5 \u2013 Luminance distribution components <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 6 Subjective assessment 6.1 Conditions of subjective assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 6.2 Result of sensory evaluation Figure 6 \u2013 Examination environment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 7 Creating a legibility evaluation model 7.1 Multiple regression analysis 7.2 Results of multiple regression analysis Figure 7 \u2013 Result of sensory evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 7.3 Demonstration experiment 7.4 Conclusion Figure 8 \u2013 Experimental score versus prediction score (VL) of EPD Table 2 \u2013 EPDs for verification <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Electronic paper displays – Legibility of EPD in spatial frequency<\/b><\/p>\n |